Skip to content
Smoothed vs jagged growth

CAGR Calculator

To calculate Compound Annual Growth Rate, take the ending value divided by the starting value, raise it to the power of one over the number of years, then subtract one: CAGR = (End/Start)^(1/n) − 1. This page overlays the smooth CAGR curve on top of the actual jagged year-by-year price path so you can SEE why 10% CAGR does not mean a 10% gain every year.

10.09%
Current CAGR
162%
Total return
6 index presets
S&P / NASDAQ / etc
2-line overlay
Smooth vs jagged

Quick Conversion

Formula: CAGR (%) = (End/Start)^(1/n) − 1

Compound Growth Curve (smoothed vs jagged)

CAGR smoothed curve vs jagged actual pathCompound growth chart comparing the smoothed CAGR curve at 10.09% to the actual jagged year-by-year price path from 100 to 261.6 over 10 years.100132165197229262yr 0yr 5yr 10Actual jagged pathSmoothed CAGR 10.09%Compound growth: smoothed CAGR vs actual price path
Endpoints
CAGR
10.09%
per year
Total
162%
cumulative

Real index presets (2014-2024 endpoints)

End-value multiplier → CAGR table (for n=10 years)

End / StartCAGR @ 5yrCAGR @ 10yrCAGR @ 20yr
1.1x1.92%0.96%0.48%
1.25x4.56%2.26%1.12%
1.5x8.45%4.14%2.05%
1.75x11.84%5.76%2.84%
2x14.87%7.18%3.53%
2.5x20.11%9.60%4.69%
3x24.57%11.61%5.65%
5x37.97%17.46%8.38%
10x58.49%25.89%12.20%
50x118.67%47.88%21.60%

Need to project forward with a known rate? Use the Appreciation Calculator →

Formula

CAGR = (End / Start)^(1/n) − 1
Geometric mean return. Always less than the arithmetic average for non-constant series (Jensen's inequality, 1906).

Worked: $100 → $261.60 over 10 years → CAGR = (2.616)^(0.1) − 1 = 0.101 = 10.1% per year.

From Bachelier to GIPS: the long road to CAGR

In 2026, a sell-side equity research analyst covering a SaaS company has to defend a 10-year 8% revenue CAGR projection to a buy-side portfolio manager. The geometric mean return — what we now call CAGR — is the lingua franca of professional investors, mandated by the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), policed by the SEC, and reported on every Bloomberg Terminal screen. This tool draws the line.

The mathematical foundation begins with Louis Bachelier, a French PhD student at the Sorbonne, whose 1900 thesis "Théorie de la Spéculation" treated stock prices as random walks five years before Einstein's Brownian motion paper. Bachelier implicitly used geometric returns when he modelled log-price increments as Gaussian. His work sat unread for 50 years before Paul Samuelson rediscovered it in the 1950s.

Johan Jensen's 1906 inequality proved that for any convex function (and the logarithm of compound returns is concave, its negative convex), the expected value of the function exceeds the function of the expected value. Practically: arithmetic average return overstates the actual compound return whenever returns vary. This is why a 50% gain followed by a 50% loss leaves you at 75% of your starting capital, not 100%.

Harry Markowitz formalized portfolio theory in his 1952 Journal of Finance paper. By treating returns as random variables with mean and variance, Markowitz showed the efficient frontier — and the "mean" he referred to was implicitly the geometric mean (CAGR), since portfolio compounding requires it. Markowitz, William Sharpe and Merton Miller shared the 1990 Nobel Prize in Economics. Modigliani and Miller (1958) used CAGR implicitly in their irrelevance-of-capital-structure proof.

Mutual-fund performance reporting was wild-west until 1988 when the SEC introduced standardized after-fee returns under Rule 482. From 1988 onward, every mutual fund prospectus in the US must show 1-, 5- and 10-year CAGRs computed identically. Hedge funds escaped the rule until the 2020 SEC Marketing Rule (under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940) extended similar disclosure requirements to private funds.

The CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), first published 1995 and revised in 2010 and 2020, mandate time-weighted geometric returns for institutional asset managers. GIPS-compliant composites are required for any firm marketing to pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and endowments. The CAGR computed on this page would not pass GIPS audit (which requires daily-cash-flow-adjusted returns) but it gives the right answer for the simplest start-to-end case.

By 2026 CAGR has become the dominant growth metric beyond finance: analytics dashboards quote subscriber CAGR, hardware vendors quote shipment CAGR, even sports leagues quote attendance CAGR. Every figure published by the US Census Bureau or BLS as "average annual growth" is computed as CAGR not arithmetic mean. The Federal Reserve's FRED database labels them "Compounded Annual Rate of Change."

How to use the CAGR widget

  1. Enter the start value. Type the starting balance or index level.
  2. Enter the end value. Type the ending balance or index level after the holding period.
  3. Set years. Slide the years control 1-30. CAGR recomputes live.
  4. Pick an index preset. One click loads real 10-yr endpoints plus a realistic jagged price path.
  5. Compare the two lines. Blue dashed = smoothed CAGR. Red solid = actual jagged path. Endpoints always match.

CAGR calculator — frequently asked questions

Have more questions? Contact us

What equity analysts say

4.9
Based on 5,740 reviews

I model 5-year revenue CAGR for every coverage company. The smoothed-vs-jagged overlay perfectly explains why our DCF base case differs from the actual print quarter to quarter. The 13.6% NASDAQ preset matches what I use in slides. CFA Institute would approve.

M
Mthembiseni Sibusisiwe Hlongwane-Khumalo
Sell-side equity research analyst, tech sector
May 22, 2026

The MSCI EAFE 4.5% CAGR preset is exactly what I plug into our 10-year capital market assumptions. The jagged actual-path overlay makes Markowitz volatility intuitive for our IC presentations — clients see why diversification reduces variance without reducing CAGR.

A
Aleksandra Magdalena Wiśniewska-Kowalczyk
Investment analyst, multi-asset OCIO
April 29, 2026

I tested the formula by hand for the gold preset — 9.5% checks out exactly per LBMA fixings. The Jensen-inequality note in FAQ #3 explaining why arithmetic mean overstates CAGR is the cleanest one-paragraph explanation I've seen anywhere online. Sharing with our junior analysts.

C
Chukwuemeka Obinwa Chinedumere
CFA charterholder, multi-asset portfolio manager
April 4, 2026

I use this tool when modelling acquisition returns — the BTC 47% preset is a great teaching tool for showing why CAGR alone is dangerous for high-volatility assets. The 80% drawdown on BTC is plain in the red jagged line. Excellent education layer.

B
Bronwyn Anthea van der Linde-Pretorius
Corporate development analyst, listed industrials
March 15, 2026

Love using our calculator?

Related financial calculators

Learn More

Related Articles

Dive deeper with our expert guides and tutorials related to CAGR Calculator — Compound Growth Curve

Loading articles...