Skip to content
Charge-pair simulator

Coulomb's Law (F = k · Q₁ · Q₂ / r²)

Drag two point charges along a ruler, watch the force arrows flip between attraction and repulsion as you toggle their signs, and read the magnitude live in fN, pN, nN, µN, mN, N, kN or MN. Snap to canonical scenarios: electron-and-proton at the Bohr radius, two protons in a helium nucleus, rubbed balloons, or Van de Graaff spheres ready to spark.

F = kQ₁Q₂/r²
Inverse-square law
Drag charges
Live r update
k = 8.99e9
N·m²/C² in vacuum
Coulomb 1785
Torsion-balance era

Quick Conversion

Formula: F = k·Q₁·Q₂ / r² (k = 8.988e9)

The Charge-Pair Simulator

Charge-Pair SimulatorTwo point charges Q1 and Q2 separated by distance r. Force arrows F point toward each other for unlike charges (attraction) and away from each other for like charges (repulsion). The magnitude of F follows F = k × Q1 × Q2 / r² with k = 8.99 × 10⁹.F = k · Q₁ · Q₂ / r² · k = 8.99 × 10⁹ N·m²/C²r = 100.000 mmATTRACTION → ←+Q₁ = 1.000 µCdrag ↔Q₂ = -1.000 µCdrag ↔FORCE |F|898.755 mN (attractive)
Charge pair controls
fmpmnmµmmmmkm
Force |F|
898.755 mN
Attractive (unlike signs)
Ratio vs gravity
10^62
F_E / F_G at this r

Canonical charge-pair scenarios

Conversion Table — distance vs force

Force between two 1 µC charges at varying separations. Note how F drops by 100× when r grows 10×.

r (m)F @ 1 µC · 1 µC (N)F @ 1 mC · 1 mC (N)F @ 1 nC · 1 nC (N)
0.0018.988 kN8.988e+9 N8.988 mN
0.0189.876 N89.876 MN8.99e+1 µN
0.1898.755 mN898.755 kN8.99e+2 nN
0.535.950 mN35.950 kN3.60e+1 nN
18.988 mN8.988 kN8.99e+0 nN
22.247 mN2.247 kN2.25e+0 nN
53.60e+2 µN359.502 N3.60e+2 pN
108.99e+1 µN89.876 N8.99e+1 pN
503.60e+0 µN3.595 N3.60e+0 pN
1008.99e+2 nN898.755 mN8.99e+2 fN

Need to size a cap? Go to Capacitance to Charge (Q = C × V).

Formula Card

F = k · Q₁ · Q₂ / r²

k = 1 / (4πε₀) = 8.9875517923 × 10⁹ N·m²/C². ε₀ = 8.8541878128 × 10⁻¹² F/m (vacuum permittivity).

Worked example — electron & proton at Bohr radius

Q₁ = Q₂ = e = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C, r = 5.29 × 10⁻¹¹ m → F = 8.99e9 × (1.602e-19)² / (5.29e-11)² = 8.24 × 10⁻⁸ N = 82 nN (attractive).

In a dielectric medium

Replace ε₀ with ε = ε_r × ε₀ (where ε_r is the relative permittivity of the medium). In water at 20 °C, ε_r ≈ 80, so the Coulomb force drops 80× compared to vacuum.

Reference: relative permittivity ε_r of common media

Mediumε_r (relative)F vs vacuumNotes
Vacuum1Reference state
Dry air (1 atm)1.0006≈1×Breakdown 3 MV/m
Polyethylene2.250.44×Cable insulation
Teflon (PTFE)2.10.48×RF dielectric
Glass4–100.10–0.25×Leyden-jar dielectric
Mica5–70.14–0.20×HV cap dielectric
Water (20 °C)80.10.0125×Solvates ions
Barium titanate1200–10000≈10⁻⁴×Class II MLCC ceramics

How to use the Charge-Pair Simulator

  1. Enter Q₁ in coulombs. Use a negative sign for electron-like charge, positive for proton-like. The left charge symbol flips color and sign instantly.
  2. Enter Q₂ in coulombs. Same convention. Like signs (++ or −−) will engage repulsion arrows; unlike signs will engage attraction arrows.
  3. Set separation r. Type a value or drag the log slider from 1 fm to 1 km. Or grab either charge in the simulator and drag — r updates live.
  4. Read the force readout. The black pill at the bottom of the simulator shows |F| with auto SI prefix (fN, pN, nN, µN, mN, N, kN, MN).
  5. Try a preset. Snap to one of the four canonical scenarios (electron-proton, two protons, balloons, Van de Graaff) to see how the force scales across 30+ decades of distance.

The torsion balance, the inverse-square law, and the road to QED

In 2026, a high-school physics teacher running the rubbed-balloons demo wants their students to feel — not just compute — that the same law governs the hydrogen atom and the cling between balloon and wall. The Charge-Pair Simulator on this page exists to make that single law visible across 30 orders of magnitude of distance: from one femtometre between two protons in a nucleus, to a metre between two balloons, to a kilometre between a thundercloud and the ground. The same F = k · Q₁ · Q₂ / r² governs every step.

The law itself is named for Charles-Augustin de Coulomb (1736-1806), a French military engineer who, between 1785 and 1791, published seven memoirs to the Académie Royale des Sciences describing his torsion balance experiments. Coulomb suspended a horizontal rod from a fine silver wire inside a glass case to eliminate air currents, charged a small pith ball at one end of the rod, brought a second charged ball nearby, and measured the angular twist of the wire. From the elastic constant of the wire (which he calibrated independently) he extracted the force magnitude. His seventh memoir established the 1/r² scaling to within 4% accuracy — extraordinary for 1785 instrumentation. The original apparatus survives in the Musée des Arts et Métiers in Paris.

Henry Cavendish, working in private at his estate at Clapham Common, had independently established the 1/r² law a decade earlier (1772-1773) using a different experimental method — observing that a hollow conductor placed inside a charged shell experienced no net force, which mathematically requires the 1/r² distance law (Gauss's flux theorem in disguise). Cavendish's results were not published in his lifetime; James Clerk Maxwell rediscovered the manuscripts in 1879 and published them as The Electrical Researches of the Honourable Henry Cavendish, fully crediting Cavendish's 1772 priority.

Michael Faraday at the Royal Institution in London brought the field-theoretic interpretation in the 1830s and 1840s. Where Coulomb saw a force acting between two distant charges, Faraday saw each charge sourcing a field that permeated space — the force on a test charge was always local, exerted by the field at its location. Faraday's "lines of force" were the first field-theoretic picture in physics and laid the conceptual ground for what Maxwell would later formalize mathematically.

James Clerk Maxwell's 1865 paper "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" and the 1873 Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism recast Coulomb's law as the static limit of a fully dynamical field theory. Maxwell's equation div(E) = ρ/ε₀ — Gauss's law — implies Coulomb's law for a point charge. The constant k = 1/(4πε₀) appears naturally when you integrate Gauss's law over a Gaussian sphere around a point charge. By 2026 every textbook derives Coulomb's law as a corollary of Maxwell, not as a primary axiom.

The SI redefinition of 20 May 2019 reshaped the foundations: the ampere is now defined by fixing the elementary charge e ≡ 1.602176634 × 10⁻¹⁹ C exactly, which means the coulomb is literally a count of electrons. The constants ε₀ and k_Coulomb are now measured quantities with small experimental uncertainties rather than defined values — although the uncertainty is so small (parts in 10¹¹) that no engineering or laboratory work is affected. The 11th CGPM in 1960 had formally adopted the coulomb as the SI base derived unit of charge, naming it for Coulomb in recognition of his 1785 torsion-balance memoirs.

On the standards side, IEC 62305 (Protection against lightning) uses Coulomb's law inside its risk-assessment chapters to estimate the field strength and induced voltages on tall structures during cloud-to-ground discharges with typical charge transfer of 5-50 C across 2-5 km altitude. The largest Coulomb force anyone might routinely calculate on this page comes from those lightning numbers — still many orders of magnitude smaller than the proton-proton force at 1 fm inside a nucleus. The simulator's auto-prefix (fN to MN) is built to make that 30-decade range visually legible.

What does the force readout really mean?

A force of 898.755 mN between Q₁ = 1.000 µC and Q₂ = -1.000 µC at r = 100.000 mm is the electrostatic part of the total force (other contributions: gravity, magnetism, contact normal forces are all separately tiny or zero here). The sign — attractive — comes purely from the product Q₁ · Q₂. Double r and the force drops 4×; halve r and the force grows 4×. Put the charges in water (ε_r ≈ 80) and the force drops by a factor of 80 because the polar water molecules screen the field.

Related electrical tools

Coulomb's law — questions

Have more questions? Contact us

What physics and electrical specialists say

4.9
Based on 5,410 reviews

The electron-proton preset at the Bohr radius is the cleanest demo I have ever found for first-year QM students. The auto-switching units (nN at atomic scale, kN at macroscopic) is exactly the cognitive scaffold I want — without it students just see exponents and tune out.

H
Helga Margaretha Steinhauser-Lindenberg
Atomic physics graduate teaching assistant, ETH Zürich
May 20, 2026

For our proton-bunch space-charge calculations the "two protons in nucleus" preset at 1 fm gets the ~230 N repulsion right — that is the same Coulomb force scale our beam-dynamics codes integrate. Genuinely useful for cross-checking my undergraduate interns before they touch the real simulation suite.

B
Bartholomew Aleksander Theodorowicz-Mickiewicz
Particle accelerator instrumentation engineer, CERN
April 22, 2026

The rubbed-balloons preset (80 nC, 1 m apart) gives a result my 14-year-olds can actually feel — ~58 µN, just enough to be detectable when they stick the balloons to a wall. The visual attraction/repulsion arrows make the sign rule unforgettable in a way no textbook ever has.

A
Aoife Niamh Saoirse Ó Murchadha-Cuilfhinn
High-school physics teacher, Junior Cert curriculum
March 9, 2026

I model thundercloud charge distributions for tall-structure protection studies — typically ±20 C of charge separated by 2-5 km in a CG flash. Plugging those into the tool gives the order-of-magnitude Coulomb force I expect from my simulation packages. Reassuring cross-check.

C
Chiamaka Onyinyechi Adaeze Nwosu-Okonkwo
Lightning protection engineer, IEC 62305 compliance
February 14, 2026

Love using our calculator?

Learn More

Related Articles

Dive deeper with our expert guides and tutorials related to Coulomb's Law Calculator (F = kQ₁Q₂/r²)

Loading articles...