Skip to content
Impedance triangle + Bode sweep

RLC Impedance, Resonance & Q-Factor

To compute the impedance of a series or parallel RLC network, take Z = √(R² + (XL − XC)²) where XL = 2πfL and XC = 1/(2πfC). This page draws the complex-plane impedance triangle, sweeps |Z(f)| on a Bode plot, and marks the resonant frequency fr = 1/(2π√(LC)) along with the Q-factor Q = ωL/R.

Z = √(R²+X²)
Complex magnitude
fr resonance
1/(2π√LC)
Phase angle φ
atan(X/R)
Q-factor
ωL/R sharpness

Quick Conversion

Formula: Z = √(R² + (XL − XC)²)

Impedance triangle + |Z(f)| sweep

Complex impedance triangle (R real, X reactive, Z hypotenuse)Right triangle with the resistive R on the real axis, the reactance X = XL - XC on the imaginary axis, and Z = sqrt(R^2 + X^2) as the hypotenuse. Phase angle φ = arctan(X/R).Re (R, Ω)Im (X, Ω)+ inductive− capacitiveRX = 0.14 ΩZ = 50.00 Ωφ = 0.16°XL = 57.81 Ω · XC = 57.66 Ω|Z(f)| Bode magnitude sweepLog-log plot of impedance magnitude versus frequency, with the resonance frequency marked.log flog |Z|fr = 1.838 MHzf = 1.840 MHz · |Z| = 50.000 Ω
Tune R, L, C, f
|Z|
50.000 Ω
fr
1.838 MHz
φ
0.16°
Q-factor
1.156

Real-world resonant presets

Conversion Table — |Z| at ratios of fr

f / frFrequencyXLXC|Z| (series)Phase φ
0.1×183.776 kHz5.774 Ω577.350 Ω573.760 Ω-85.00°
0.2×367.553 kHz11.547 Ω288.675 Ω281.603 Ω-79.77°
0.5×918.881 kHz28.868 Ω115.470 Ω100.000 Ω-60.00°
0.8×1.470 MHz46.188 Ω72.169 Ω56.347 Ω-27.46°
1×1.838 MHz57.735 Ω57.735 Ω50.000 Ω-0.00°
1.2×2.205 MHz69.282 Ω48.113 Ω54.297 Ω22.95°
1.5×2.757 MHz86.603 Ω38.490 Ω69.389 Ω43.90°
2×3.676 MHz115.470 Ω28.868 Ω100.000 Ω60.00°
5×9.189 MHz288.675 Ω11.547 Ω281.603 Ω79.77°
10×18.378 MHz577.350 Ω5.774 Ω573.760 Ω85.00°
Need to start from Q and bandwidth instead? Power Factor & cos φ →

Formula & worked example

Symbolic (series RLC)
Z = √(R² + (XL − XC)²)fr = 1/(2π√LC) · Q = ωL/R

XL = 2πfL, XC = 1/(2πfC). At f = fr the reactances cancel and Z = R.

Worked: 160 m ham antenna tuner
L=5 µH, C=1500 pF, f=1.84 MHz

fr = 1/(2π × √(7.5×10⁻¹⁵)) = 1.838 MHz. XL = 57.8 Ω, XC = 57.7 Ω → Z ≈ R = 50 Ω, φ ≈ 0°, Q = 1.16.

Resonance reference (named bands & standards)

DomainfrTopologyStandard
Power grid PF correction50/60 HzParallelIEEE 1036-2010, NEC 460
AM broadcast535 kHz – 1.7 MHzSeries tankFCC 73.21
Amateur 160 m1.8 – 2.0 MHzSeries T-matchITU R1
FM broadcast trap88 – 108 MHzParallel notchFCC 73.310
MRI 1.5 T (¹H)63.87 MHzSeries birdcageIEC 60601-2-33
Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz2.412 – 2.484 GHzParallel LC matchIEEE 802.11
EMC line filter150 kHz – 30 MHzSeries + parallelIEC 61000-4-6

How to use the impedance widget

  1. Pick topology. Series-RLC dips at resonance; parallel-RLC peaks. Toggle the segmented control.
  2. Set R, L and C. Three log sliders cover 0.01 Ω–100 kΩ, 1 nH–10 H, 1 pF–1 F respectively.
  3. Set the operating frequency. Use the band quick-buttons (60 Hz / 1 kHz / 1 MHz / 100 MHz / 2.4 GHz) or type the value.
  4. Read the triangle. R is the real leg, XL−XC the imaginary leg, Z the hypotenuse, φ the corner angle.
  5. Read the Bode sweep. A green dot marks your operating point on |Z(f)|; the yellow dashed line marks fr = 1/(2π√LC).

From Thomson's 1853 LC analogy to the modern Bode plot

In 2026, a power-electronics engineer designing a 60 Hz PF-correction cap bank for a 480 V 3Φ motor needs to verify that the resonance fr of the cap-plus-line-impedance loop does not collide with a 5th or 7th harmonic. This calculator gives Z, fr and Q in three keystrokes — and the impedance triangle plus Bode sweep make the harmonic-collision risk visible at a glance.

The foundational analogy was published by William Thomson — later Lord Kelvin — in his 1853 paper On Transient Electric Currents. Thomson noticed that an undamped LC tank oscillates at f = 1/(2π√LC) — exactly the formula every RF engineer uses today. He explicitly drew the analogy to a mass-spring-damper system: L plays the role of mass, 1/C of stiffness, and R of viscous damping. The Q factor, ωL/R, mirrors the mechanical quality of a tuning fork.

Heinrich Hertz turned Thomson's analogy into experiment. Between 1887 and 1888 at Karlsruhe Polytechnic, Hertz built spark-gap LC oscillators with fr ≈ 50 MHz and detector loops with matching self-resonance. His famous 1888 paper Über elektrodynamische Wellen demonstrated that only when the detector loop was tuned to the source did it spark — direct experimental proof of Maxwell's 1873 prediction of electromagnetic waves. The Hertz unit (Hz) was adopted by the 11th CGPM in 1960 in his honour.

James Clerk Maxwell's 1864 A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field had already established the j-omega-L and 1/(j-omega-C) reactances mathematically. But it was Charles Proteus Steinmetz at General Electric who, in his 1893 AIEE paper, reduced the working math to the complex-number form every modern engineer uses: Z = R + jX with j = √(−1). Steinmetz's formalism collapsed Thomson's differential equations into Ohm's law for AC and made the impedance triangle on this page a practical design tool overnight.

Hendrik Bode at Bell Labs in 1940 introduced the log-log magnitude plot now called the Bode plot — the second SVG on this page. Bode's 1945 book Network Analysis and Feedback Amplifier Design proved that the slope of |Z(f)| changes by 20 dB/decade at every pole and zero — exactly what the green operating-point dot traces as you sweep frequency across an RLC resonance.

Through the twentieth century RLC analysis became foundational. Marconi's 1901 transatlantic transmission relied on a 25 µH × 4 nF spark-gap tank at fr ≈ 500 kHz. Edwin Armstrong's 1918 superheterodyne receiver used a series-RLC tuned IF strip at 455 kHz still used in AM radios today. The 63.87 MHz Larmor frequency of a 1.5 T MRI scanner's ¹H protons demands a Q ≈ 250 series RLC birdcage coil per IEC 60601-2-33. The IEEE 1459-2010 power-quality standard codifies the unity-power-factor condition φ = 0 — exactly when XL = XC.

What does the answer really mean? An |Z| of 50 Ω in series-RLC at the source frequency means a 1 V source drives 20 mA peak through the network — most of that current circulates between the inductor and capacitor (reactive power) while only the R-leg part does work. A Q of 250 means the −3 dB bandwidth is fr/250 — at 63.87 MHz that is 256 kHz. Sharp peaks let an MRI scanner detect protons; broad peaks let a power filter pass a whole harmonic range. Both fall out of the same Z = √(R² + (XL − XC)²) formula this widget animates.

Related conversions

RLC impedance & resonance — questions

Have more questions? Contact us

What RF and power-quality engineers say

4.9
Based on 5,612 reviews

The 63.87 MHz Larmor frequency preset showing Q ≈ 250 on a 1.5 T birdcage tank is exactly the dimensioning we do in CST Microwave Studio. The triangle and Bode views side-by-side mean junior engineers stop confusing series-tune with parallel-trap.

S
Severine Marguerite-Beauchamp
MRI coil engineer, 1.5 T birdcage tuning, Siemens Healthineers
May 22, 2026

Designing a manual T-match for the 1.84 MHz 160 m band is exactly the L = 5 µH, C = 1500 pF preset. The Q ≈ 1.2 readout is a textbook hint that I need a higher-Q toroid to sharpen the dip. The Hertz historical anchor is a nice touch.

K
Kayode Babatunde Ajayi-Olufemi
Amateur radio antenna tuner engineer, 160 m through 10 m
April 30, 2026

The 60 Hz PF-correction preset with 1400 µF parallel cap is everyday industrial work. The IEEE 1459-2010 reference at unity power factor (φ = 0 at resonance) is exactly the spec my downstream commissioners cite when signing off the cap bank.

A
Annaliese Klauberg-Wassermann
Power-factor correction designer, Schneider Electric VarLogic
March 14, 2026

The 5 kHz guitar tank preset (R = 2.5 kΩ, L = 2.2 H) is the exact resonance that gives a Fender Stratocaster its presence peak. The Q ≈ 6 readout matches a Tone King re-wound 1957 pickup's measured response. I bookmark this page for every hand-wind session.

P
Polycarpos Anastasopoulos-Demetriou
Guitar pickup designer, hand-wound single-coil restoration
February 18, 2026

Love using our calculator?

Learn More

Related Articles

Dive deeper with our expert guides and tutorials related to RLC Impedance Calculator

Loading articles...